The three models Case-Based Methods and Case-Based Reasoning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility Theory and Learning Objects presented are similar in that CBR and CFT are similar and Learning Objects is different from these two, referring to online resources. CBR and CFT depend on case based studies and context of real life scenarios. They both have context and comparison of data or information. CFT however allows more flexibility for the learner by allowing the different branching options that lead to higher critical thinking.
My initial reaction was that both models require a lot of time resource and factual information to for the cases. In addition it needs to be organized, developed and the almost impossible with training budgets and time needed for corporations to take out of their busy schedules for learning. If the resources are available, it would however be great for adult learning, because learning can be relevant, and the designer can build upon existing knowledge and make learning interesting. I would consider these theories for learning, especially the CBL. This can be adapted more easily for learning than the CFT as I think the CFT would require more resources and development to branch to different pathways.
Depending on what the learner needs to be able to do, I think given the resources, this would make learning quite engaging and interactive. Adult like learning that is relevant, they like to have information and scenarios because they can identify and relate to information when given in a story or case. I think CBL is more applicable to the practical world in corporations, where the adults can learn in the real context of the workplace and live cases. .Learning Objects would therefore support these models.
Given that these models are time intensive and resource intensive, it would require a lot of organization, design and development to be successful. I therefore would recommend Mindjet, bubbl.us to organize ideas and the management of brainstorming and project. I think it would require a team effort to create this so the group would need to work and review during all phases, I like the use of Google docs for collaborating, WebEx to meet and share ideas etc.
Hi Gena,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that CBl would be a great model to use with adult learners. I find it easier to remember new instruction if it is tied in with a personal experience, or story, that I can relate to. The Jonassen article clearly pointed out the benefits of using stories/case histories when instructing new employees. The trick, as you mentioned, is to have the resources available for development and for learner training. It would be nice to develop training that could be shared across several companies, etc., so that the costs could also be divided.
Thanks Marion
DeleteI always enjoy reading your blog and hearing your comments. You explain things very clearly. I do however find creating cases, scenarios challenging to do for eLearning. Do you have any experience in Scenarios for elearning? Face to face is much simplier to create. Do you have experience with eLearning or Virtual Instructor Led in Case Studies? If you do, I would appreciate some suggestions or best practices. Learning the theory of these theories is one thing but applying them is another.
Thanks.
Gena Gutierrez
Hi Gena,
ReplyDeleteTo add to your point about time and resources in developing case based learning, I have observed interesting alternatives in the corporate world. Many times there is no formal training department. In most cases, people are usually paired with a seasoned employee who guides them through real work. The drawback there is that you not only have a learning curve for the new employee, but you also decrease the productivity of the trainer who often has to combine training with continuing daily duties. As I have observed in healthcare information technology, being able to create and use cases can also be hindered by the fact that you have to create a test database and keep that up as well. However, I think that it would be a worthy investment for even small companies to develop cases and scenarios so that customers/clients do not suffer the consequences of someone's trial and error learning process.
Hi Gena,
ReplyDeleteThe investment of time and resources required to use both of these models was definitely something that stuck out to me as well! I agree that CFT would likely warrant more resourced dedicated to development. I wonder what the cost differential would be between web-based instructional modules and face-to-face training for each model (assuming equivalent results--transfer of learning--for both delivery methods).
I think you're absolutely right that "given the resources", case-based methods can be interactive as well as engaging, especially for adult learners for the reasons you mentioned in your post.
And yes, I'm all about the mind-mapping tools! :)
~Lauren